
Thesis Reflection
Having the chance to produce and work on a topic related to the AE discipline has been a great and rewarding opportunity. Being able to have full reign on the outcome is something that many other majors do not allow. The Architectural Engineering major allows the student to apply and use the information that was taught to them throughout the entire 5 year major and know that the work that is presented is done to the best of their ability. Because this information is a real life scenario, all of the results give the owners an alternative option to currently design systems, possibly altering the construction of the building.
The overall thesis project has been a very extensive and individualized project that really engages each person differently. Because there there is no one right answer for any specific discipline, there are a lot of options to choose from in the redesign section. This also creates the opportunity to learn exactly what I am going to be doing in the future without any safety net to fall back on. My personal experience allowed me to branch outside of the classroom to expend on already learned information. Some information that was needed for the breadth topic (electrical) was not taught inside the classroom for the electrical option. This forced me to contact industry professionals for their advice on alternative designs. I also needed to contact Auburn University, who was gracious enough to give me needed information on the campus to keep my analysis as accurate as possible.
The most helpful information that I was able to use within the analysis came from my Masters degree coursework. The specific class being AE 551 - Combined Heat and Power. Through the use of the masters degree, I was able to further understand the information as opposed to someone that was not in the Masters program.
In the end, the process of Penn State's Architectural Engineering senior thesis has given me a much better idea of introducing my passion of mechanical design to real life scenarios outside of the classroom. Even though the classroom is necessary to understand most of what is being used inside the thesis design, I think that this class provides a much higher form of learning as understanding to each person that goes through this major.
-
Note: While great efforts have been taken to provide accurate and complete information on the pages of CPEP, please be aware that the information contained herewith is considered a work‐in progress for this thesis project. Modifications and changes related to the original building designs and construction methodologies for this senior thesis project are solely the interpretation of William Manning. Changes and discrepancies in no way imply that the original design contained errors or was flawed. Differing assumptions, code references, requirements, and methodologies have been incorporated into this thesis project; therefore, investigation results may vary from the original design.
William H Manning | Mechanical Option
Advisor: Dr. James Freihaut
Brown-Kopel Engineering Student Achievement Center
Auburn, Alabama
News Feed
04-12-2018 Final Presentation Posted
04-2-2018 Final Report Submitted
12-8-2017 Final CPEP Review
12-8-2017 Proposal Posted to CPEP
11-17-2017 Breadth Topic Proposal Posted
10-30-2017 Thesis Abstract Final Mounted on Board
10-22-2017 Thesis Project Abstract
10-18-2017 Building Statistics Part 2
10-02-2017 Building Statistics Part 1
09-25-2017 Thesis Abstrat posted to CPEP
09-08-2017 CPEP Full Menu Functionality
09-04-2017 CPEP Home Page Draft
08-31-2017 Turned in Project Initiation Checklist
08-31-2017 Confirmed Master List Info
08-29-2017 Mailed AE Dept Thank You Letter
08-27-2017 Obtained Project Documentation
08-25-2017 Sent Personal Note
08-24-2017 Owner permission Received